It is looking like a pretty massive programming project to not only allow people to upload, but sort, search, compare, etc., but that is something we are really excited about doing. Hier findet man auch einen AMD, nämlich den Ryzen 7 3700K mit 8 Kernen. One of the reasons we sometimes used the Intel 10th Gen CPUs over Ryzen when the performance was similar was because only Intel platforms had passed our qualification process for Thunderbolt. Is there any chance you might add capture one to the software you benchmark in the future? Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Is the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X good for Lightroom Classic? Frequency can be grabbed through WMI or through the command line, but timings would need an external application which we have tried to avoid doing since it makes cross-platform support much harder. Archived. The differents can be mor den 40% !!! You can apply those after you're done, as a batch. Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing: *All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of October 26, 2020. You are of course free to do whatever you want with your own system, but we've always taken the stance that reliability is more important than getting a bit more performance since in a production environment, system crashes and lost work costs far more money than losing a few percent performance. Close. The difference shouldn't be more than 40% though. I am stoked for the release of the Ryzen 5000 chips. 9.1's biggest reduction was undo (Ctrl-Z), now with 9.2, applying the slider is as slow as undo. The only oddity in our testing was that the Ryzen 9 5950X ended up performing worse than the 5900X - in large part due to some performance issues with the "Build 500x Smart Previews" tests. Lightroom catalog is essentially a database that contains all imported … At the first look it seems like there can't be more than 5% but :-): RAMDual rank -> Single rank2 DIMM -> 4 DIMMDaisy Chain -> T-Topology2666 Mhz -> 3600Mhz -> 4400 MhzCL 19-19-19-19 -> CL-14-15-15AMD -> INTEL, Resolution1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 -> 3840 x 2160. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. Something like a RTX 2060 is probably a better choice since it will likely perform about the same in Lightroom Classic, but at a much lower cost. We do have a couple of projects planned for 2020 that we hope will help things quite a bit for this however. Hello AMD! Both missing informations are very important for the endresult. 9.2 is at least 4 times slower than the last V8 release. Can you please explain this? Benchmark Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs Intel 10th Gen. Are the AMD Ryzen 5000-series or Intel Core 10th Gen better for Lightroom Classic? Should you choose the new Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core CPU or the Intel i9 9900K 8-core? Iknow, i know, it's a little bit malicious :-). I’ve narrowed it down to 2 top contenders, the TR 3960X and the Zen 5900X. That is definitely something I want to look at! We might do something for other apps that use the GPU more (Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, etc), but I doubt we will invest the time to test Lightroom Classic. Thanks for all the reviews you're making, there are really useful. System Specs ----- Asus Pro X370 Prime (Bios 0515) Ryzen 1700x @ … This benchmark version includes the ability to upload the results to our online database, so if you want to know how your own system compares, you can download and run the benchmark yourself. The thing is, Ryzen isn’t really impressive at all in terms of performance. Not only it's probably more important and has bigger impact on the workflow than the export, but one usually exports less images than import and the work is already done. Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. So, it is possible the work they are doing there is negatively affecting the tasks we can test, but LrC is still way better overall for the end users. In fact, this is the speed we are planning on using in our Ryzen workstations once JDEC DDR4-2933 16GB sticks are available. For the Crowd - The overall result of active and passive tasks are indicators. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Hey Matt, there are some things that are not clear to me. So far I'm using OCR to get everything in excel and compare things. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. They do have a 10-20% higher price tag as well, although in terms of absolute cost that works out to only a $50 increase which is fairly small if you look at it as a part of the overall cost of a computer. I'm currently speccing up a new desktop build to mostly run Lightroom and Photoshop, and have read elsewhere that there are good gains in memory performance by using 3600Mhz ram with CL16 or CL18 timing. Screen resolution is easier, but it also more complicated than it sounds. You already know it better!• Looking at the NEF numbers, there is really no reason to spend even a penny more for a 3950x instead of a 3900x (for Photoshop and Lightroom only). The 8-core Xeon will fit but considering how much slower it is, not sure that would be an upgrade. No matter how you look at it, however, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X performs very well in Lightroom Classic. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. And 4) Lastly, AMD is saying that the TR socket will be compatible with future Treadrippers… If the 2 CPU’s are close already, does that push the TR over the top to make it that worth the added expense? Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. We've tried to work with the devs to add the functionality we need, but it can be hard to find time to add features that help us when they are busy tackling bugs and adding features that are useful for their end users. Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. I used to run this task, go out for lunch, return home and listen to music for a few hours before it finished. Soon after launch, there should be an update that adds support for AGESA 1.1.0 which is supposed to increase the performance of each Ryzen CPU by another few percent. How about a comparison between the fastest affordable Quadro (the RTX4000) and the GTX 2080 TI? Er schafft den Test in 119 Sekunden und kostet gerade mal 370 Euro.. Der Intel Core i7-8700K kostet ähnlich wenig, braucht aber für den Parcours 195 Sekunden.. Ist sieht also so aus, als ob ein aktueller AMD Ryzen Prozessor eine sehr gute und preisgünstige Wahl für Lightroom ist. Not sure there is anything meaningfully faster that will go into the current CPU socket. Organize Lightroom Catalogs. So for A7R3 42Mp .ARW files , is the 9900k better than 3900x ? Ryzen system is approximately 2x> less responsive. We used to test 1:1 preview generation, but it wasn't something supported by the API so we had to drop it when we made the benchmark available for public download. Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Gaming Performance. However, since Intel is launching their new Core X-10000 series processors and AMD is launching their new 3rd Gen Threadripper processors in the near future, we are only going to compare the 3950X to a handful of Intel and AMD CPUs. It shouldn't affect performance much, but good benchmarking is about removing variables to try to get the most accurate results as possible. With the higher-end Ryzen models, we are looking at roughly a 14% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K with the Ryzen 7 5800X, or a 21% increase with the Ryzen 9 5900X. If you want to see how it stacks up against a wider range of Intel and AMD processors, check back in the coming weeks for articles that will include the AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, Intel Core 9th Gen, and Intel Core X-10000 series processors in a number of applications. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. In my opinion that is a shame for Intel, AMD and Adobe altogether and not a reason to hype anybody. It is also worth noting that the 5800X and 5900X outperformed the 10900K not only in the passive tasks but the active ones as well, which was where Intel was previously maintaining a slight edge. Lightroom: cache size 500GB catalogue size 5-6gb library 6tb Settings and library is identical. Example for dragging the Noise Reduction Luminance slider, Fuji X-T1 RAW image: from almost real time to 3 seconds. In the past, there were arguments for using an Intel processor for Lightroom Classic if you wanted to optimize for active tasks like scrolling through images, but with the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs, AMD takes a solid lead no matter the task. But 9960x is suddenly much worse with smart previews in comparison to your October-Benchmark. Generally though, most people don't upgrade their CPU every generation since the performance gains usually aren't enough to warrant it. CL timings are really hard (impossible from what I have found so far) to get directly at the level we have access to through the various Adobe APIs. AMD has had a strong lead in Lightroom Classic for passive tasks like exporting, but Intel managed to maintain a small advantage for active tasks like scrolling through images and switching between modules. Overall, the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs from AMD are terrific for Lightroom Classic. Granted, I’m importing thousands of RAW files at a time and exporting hundreds of JPG’s (the life of a family photographer on the beach). I'm currently building a desktop machine for editing in Lightroom Classic based on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 12x 3.80GHz. You can still get more overall performance from the (significantly) more expensive Threadripper processors, but the Ryzen 9 5900X, in particular, is not too far behind those beefier models. Until recently, even 3200MHz didn't meet our stability standards, and going above that is definitely going to cause more system instability. We were close about a month ago, then we realized Lightroom 9.0 was going to launch during Adobe MAX so we held off. "Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. The second thing to note is that we are using our soon to be released Lightroom Classic Benchmark. The recently launched AMD Ryzen 2nd generation processors are a significant step forward versus the first generation Ryzen and are now well worth considering. Currently, we have articles for Photoshop, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, and a number of other applications. When I bought the 3900X I immediately noticed the huge difference when exporting images. I NEVER delete anything. In my case, switching between to Monitors (separately connected and separately tested on the same PC) 1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 (AMD RX570 4GB) gives me a difference of 17% in some important Tasks! For a number of reasons which I won't go into here, there is a preference for Quadro cards. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. The devs have also been putting a ton of work into improving many aspects of LrC that we haven't figured out a good way to test like brush/slider lag and things like that. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. I honestly don't know what specifically has caused that drop, but there have been a number of Intel security vulnerabilities that have been fixed at the expense of performance, and Lightroom Classic is adding more GPU acceleration which sometimes can reduce performance at first until they get it really dialed in. And it's not always straightforward and faster and 100% utilized with more cores etc, as export is.Also it helps import previews and develop module when you make and apply a some preset with Sharpening and Noise Reduction set to 0. This processor features a staggering 16 CPU cores which is really starting to blur the line between "consumer" and "HEDT" (High End Desktop) processors. Even with all the improvements Adobe has done in the last couple of Lightroom versions to take advantage of the GPU, it is still primarily a CPU-driven application. Maybe it is a bigger deal on older GPUs like your RX 570? I would guess maybe in 2-3 weeks we can have a version for Windows up for download. PC spec, X470 Aorus latest bios. Calibrating the monitors had no impact as expected, Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro. In our testing for RAM timings for example, we only saw around a 5% max difference between RAM speeds: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . So, personally, I wouldn't worry too much about future socket compatibility, especially with DDR5, PCI-E Gen 5, and who knows what else that might be coming in the next several years. One of the first things is to get our Lightroom Classic benchmark up for public download. That shouldn't happen though, since Lightroom likely won't ever use all your cores.3) I don't think there is an arbitrary limit like that. First things first: Thank you for the lightning fast testing of the new 3950X!However, it is very difficult to draw meaningful conclusions without a closer look at your numbers:• You seem to have tested Intel with HT-on. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. I think above a small GPU upgrade, you are going to be bottlenecked by your CPU. We actually just put a post up about why we are shifting to DDR4-3200 RAM on (most) of our systems: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Lightroom is my bottleneck- its soslow its annoying. Or is it a problem with your benchmark?• NEF-Export: Intel 9960x is about the same as 3900x/3950x as expected. 3. Hence the attraction of a single slot card. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. So my questions are: 1) given everything I’ve told you, which should I go with? That seems huge considering we only see 5-15% gains between CPU generations. Thanks for the reply. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. In order to see how each of these configurations performs in Lightroom Classic, we will be using our PugetBench for Lightroom Classic V0.92 benchmark and Lightroom Classic version 10.0. These results are then combined into an overall score to give you a general idea of how that specific configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. Right now our plate is pretty full, but that is pretty close to the top of my to-do list. PugetBench V0.8 BETA for Lightroom Classic, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. There are also some back-end features we want to make that makes it even more complex, but hugely useful for our articles. This effectively puts AMD in the lead over Intel no matter what your budget is and what parts of Lightroom Classic you want to optimize for. The Quadro line is mostly about having high amounts of VRAM which almost never a problem for photography applications. Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. Yep, it looks like performance has gotten worse for the active tasks we are testing since we first made the reference scores. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic and that performance will vary widely in different applications. Most important, however, is the performance leap in editing. It will probably end up being a pretty big project since we are going to have to take into account how many displays are being used as well as the resolution for each display (since that apparently is a big factor for Lightroom GPU performance). It also gets a bit hairy for us since we are partners with many of these companies, and very few of them seem to welcome head-to-head comparisons. Now I can just take a small break and get back to work. Could you do this, please?• In comparison today vs 6 years ago (in IT-Calender: When the dinosaurs still walked the earth): you have to pay twice as much for the CPU and twice as much for the motherboard, to get a 2-3 times faster export, but only about 35% more power in active tasks. Is there a solution for the same Benchmark as Photoshop to validate both for example - new PS Action compared with new AP Macro? Now, AMD is launching one more 3rd generation Ryzen CPU - the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Benchmark. Another factor that has changed recently is that the Gigabyte B550 Vision D motherboard - with fully certified Thunderbolt support - has launched and passed our internal qualification process. If your workflow includes other software packages, you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. The Lightroom benchmark is a bit finicky at times since we have to do quite a bit of the testing via external scripts, and de-focusing the Lightroom window can make things break. If you were to compare AMD and Intel processors based on price alone, AMD is anywhere from 11% to 30% faster than Intel. Wanted to ask - will there be benchmarking series, where the new amd GPUs are used in tandem with the new CPUs and SAM on, i am curious weather there is any performance gain to be found outside of games. Is this due to another "performance optimization" of Adobe? If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the total scores. And hold that thought on the upload thing - that is a project we are hoping to get to next year. Definitely enough to skew results, which is why our own internal testing with locked down configurations is always going to be more reliable than publicly uploaded results. For comparison, both the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core and Intel Core i9 9900K 8 Core have a MSRP of $499. Interesting, that is a much larger difference than we have seen. Its a strong alternative to lightroom and it has better performance, but I can´t seem to find how it responds to different hardwareGreat article BTW :D. Capture One is on our list, but it honestly will likely be at least a year or longer before we are able to take it on - we have a few other major project to take on first. One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. So in general, it should be better overall to leave SMT on currently. I'm sure the hardware itself has an impact as well. However, we do need to make clear that since the Intel X-series CPUs are not as strong in Lightroom Classic as the lower-priced Intel 10th Gen CPUs, that is being somewhat unfair to Intel. The K1200 is a pretty old GPU, so you should notice some difference with the newer versions of Lightroom Classic where they have been improving GPU acceleration support. The reason we use a 2080Ti in our CPU-based testing is simply to make sure that the GPU is not a bottleneck. Turning off SMT can improve performance a bit in tasks like exporting, but in the last few versions of LrC, it also lowers performance in active tasks. As has been stated in the benchmarks that the video card, above a minimum level, doesn't much impact Lightroom performance (except for the Texture slider); if I upgrade from the K1200 to the RTX 4000 vs the GTX 2080 Ti, am I going to see equivalent performance with the RTX 4000? If you are concerned about general Lightroom performance, the Intel Core i7 7700K is significantly faster for most tasks and only ~10% slower when exporting images. It does seem that Lightroom Classic in particular is memory speed sensitive and could benefit from faster RAM.